
Enrichment or hindrance? Tolerance? Close to the availability of discovery of wisdom? There will be space for difference? The difference and cultural diversity will be part of our genetic code? The aim is to see the different points of view on cultural level. The ethnicities, religions, education, economic level, the spaces, allow us to realize how important it is to have a gap to diversity, as each society is governed by its rules and thus can not make value judgments, being stuck to our cultural foundations, because otherwise never percepcionamos in a way a non society different from ours. Cultural differences are a benesse to bringing social or repulsion? The first attitude is based in particular on the rejection, but when we allow and permit its implementation of this unknown who is the "other cultural", or the image, appearance and pre-concept, inflexibility, we receive and absorb in a culture that is "strange" to a more natural. The stereotype, the standard social conditions our attitude towards the other, because pre-designed a representation even if impensada on the other. It is said with some hard part of the debate, the Western culture sees the other cultures as inferior. Underneath this idea are underlying issues such as economic and social development of Western culture to other cultures, considered underdeveloped and with explicit and different needs. But what is the poorest in society cultural level? That which closes by feel superior? Or one where space is opened to the attention of others in seeking the convergence of globalization and the social and cultural level? "We are a racist people" said to be at times. What we spoke racism? The difference and cultural diversity are essential characteristics as the fact that there are "different rules" and "people are different"! The evolution fortunately enables increasingly cease to exist and to develop the unknown with the fluidity cultural recognition. A new culture becomes a challenge to the discovery for the individual, although opinions varied in the second debate today, more receptive, more comfortable, more protected if it is in their natural space, surrounded their "mother culture". The most important thing is to give oxygen exchange. However, when it is in a minority environment, there are those who say that we feel constrained and locked the receipt cultural, although we saw the place in question if there is a premise for social integration and openness in a minority situation. The fact that we are alone in another society and obviously another culture can make us become active and follow the demand of the unknown. An immigrant is from the conquest of the country where it stands and not the reverse as required. "The physical racism is being put aside", it was said in the debate, because there is more emphasis psychological differences, but never a form of violent and extremist. A major factor is that as a blockade to knowledge and awareness of other cultures, it exaggerated the link that is intrinsic to the individual with regard to their own culture. There is a close cultural. The main reasons are usually economic issues and objectives of those seeking another culture. In the special case of immigrants, it appears that their main motivations and forces of cultural knowledge of the country they find are those who are intimately linked to possible dividends, a better quality of life, and not because the delicious food and dance typical of that that the host country. The statement that fits itself as the essential tool of work, rather than the communication of culture and development of interpersonal relationships. The racism that still exists, what the characteristics? That comes to separate from the other? Racism is now a naturalised the point that it is as if he were incorporated into our "person". "It comes from the education we receive in a way innate" (examples: funniest programmes in the media as the "Malucos of Laughter" with jokes about, "the blacks in the works"; "the blonde burras"; "the Alentejo"…) . It is an unconscious racism. On the other hand, we can find benefits in the difference. Finding the meaning of difference is the reason the individual attention and that vai education is a gradual adaptation to diversity. Enriquece us, as rational beings, as people of emotional senses and are no longer evolving. We must see the world as it is and learn from the most diverse cultures all day with so many good things that have. "The differences only bring us things advantages / personal enrichment" But there is this reality that is necessary to cease the barriers. "The mixture of day-to-day life is natural, but still we can escape this trend? The convergence that feel and see is inevitable. We ourselves are a cultural mix. Our culture is pure and many people were saying in a Portuguese? The cultural practices of today are the result of centuries of division, even if not intentional. It adds up but the problem of self-cultural and social exclusion. There is fear of rejection of the culture they live in their natural societies. Those who seek to exclude itself well pass unnoticed and leave themselves fall into anonymity. There is the fear of rejection by the other that ignores social practices in which was educated and where they deposited all their deepest values and ideologies. This openness always depends upon the individual. And you have to look not superlativar our culture to the other. The isolation is arrogance, ignorance and limitation of wisdom. Then comes an issue with great importance to what extent we in our culture, without asking anything in return? "," We are receptive or only defenders of what we believe? ".